Insurance · Document Processing Automation

Insurance Claims Document Automation

Claim files that classify, route and generate correspondence automatically, with redaction and retention rules included from the beginning.

Get a free estimate Speak with an engineer

NDA on request · Free, no-obligation estimate · Reply within one business day

NDA signed before we start

Full IP ownership on payment

Your repository from the first commit

Live demo at the end of every sprint

Built by senior engineers

How we work

One auto or property claim file collects a wide mix of documents, among them the first notice of loss, a police report, medical bills, a repair estimate, adjuster photos and eventually a demand letter or denial notice, each arriving on its own timeline from a different source. Organizing that file and putting it in front of the right examiner is a document classification and routing problem well before it becomes a coverage decision. A claims team that handles it by hand spends time sorting on every claim when that time belongs to adjusting.

Two problems sit past classification that a generic document pipeline doesn't solve. Documents leaving the carrier, sent to a repair shop, a reinsurer, or subrogation counsel, often need personal and medical information redacted first, since sharing an unredacted file with a third party creates privacy exposure the carrier owns. And outbound correspondence, a reservation-of-rights letter or a denial notice, has to include the specific disclosure language a state's unfair claims settlement practices act requires for that type of denial.

We build claims document systems that classify and route incoming documents to the correct examiner and claim file, redact sensitive information before anything leaves the carrier, generate correspondence with the disclosures a given state requires, and apply retention rules tied to how long insurance regulations actually require a claim file to be kept.

Requirements

What insurance teams need from it

Classification across many claim document types, not one format
A claim file mixes FNOL forms, medical bills, repair estimates, police reports, and photos, and a classification model tuned only on one document type, such as clean FNOL forms, misses the rest of what actually constitutes a real claim file.
Routing to the correct examiner and claim file automatically
An incoming document needs to attach to the right open claim and route to the adjuster or examiner currently handling it, based on policy number, claim number, or matched entities in the document itself, rather than landing in a shared inbox for manual sorting.
Redaction before documents leave the carrier
Sharing a claim file with a repair shop, a reinsurer, or subrogation counsel often requires stripping personal or medical information the recipient doesn't need, and that redaction has to happen consistently rather than depending on an adjuster remembering to do it manually each time.
Correspondence generation with state-specific disclosures
A reservation-of-rights letter or a denial notice needs the specific disclosure language a state's unfair claims settlement practices act requires, and that language differs enough by state and by denial reason that a generic template risks a compliance gap.
Retention tied to state insurance record rules, not a generic policy
State insurance regulations set minimum retention periods for claim files that often exceed a company's default document retention policy, and a claim under litigation hold needs that hold to override the standard schedule rather than being purged on time.

Scope

Features we build

Multi-format claims document classification
Incoming FNOL forms, medical bills, repair estimates, police reports, and photos are classified by type automatically as they arrive from any intake channel, phone, email, upload, or fax.
Automatic routing to claim file and examiner
Classified documents attach to the correct open claim and route to the assigned adjuster or examiner based on matched policy and claim identifiers, removing manual sorting from a shared intake queue.
Policy and endorsement retrieval
The relevant policy document and its endorsement history pull into the claim file automatically, giving the examiner full coverage context without a separate lookup in the policy administration system.
PII and PHI redaction before external sharing
Documents shared with a repair shop, reinsurer, or subrogation counsel are redacted for personal and medical information not relevant to that recipient, applied consistently rather than left to adjuster discretion.
Correspondence generation with required disclosures
Reservation-of-rights letters and denial notices generate with the specific disclosure language the relevant state's unfair claims settlement practices act requires for that denial reason.
Subrogation and demand package assembly
Supporting documents for a subrogation claim, the police report, repair estimate, and liability evidence, assemble into one package rather than being gathered manually from across the claim file.
Searchable claim document archive
Every document in a claim file is stored in a full-text searchable archive tied to the claim record, replacing a shared drive of scanned PDFs an examiner has to open one by one.
Retention scheduling aligned with insurance record rules
Claim files retain for the period the relevant state's insurance record-retention rule requires, with litigation holds overriding the standard schedule automatically when a claim is flagged.

Compliance and standards

state unfair claims settlement practices acts
HIPAA (where claims include medical records)
state insurer record-retention statutes

Systems it connects to

Guidewire
Duck Creek
Xactimate
Mitchell
ABBYY
Snowflake

Build vs buy

When to build it and when to buy it

Hyperscience and ABBYY, layered into Guidewire ClaimCenter or Duck Creek Claims, cover standard document capture and OCR well when a carrier mainly needs cleaner intake bolted onto a claims system already in place, and that combination is usually faster to stand up than a custom pipeline.

Custom development is worth it when document routing needs to reflect a carrier's specific triage rules across lines of business, when redaction and subrogation assembly need to integrate tightly with a proprietary claims workflow, or when correspondence generation needs to track disclosure language across many states within the same system rather than a separate letter-template tool.

Technology

Stack we usually choose

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Can the system classify and route different types of claims documents automatically?

Yes, FNOL forms, medical bills, repair estimates, police reports, and photos are classified by type as they arrive and routed to the correct open claim and assigned examiner, based on matched policy and claim identifiers rather than a shared inbox someone has to sort manually.

How does the system redact personal information before sharing a claim file with a repair shop or reinsurer?

Documents leaving the carrier for an external party are redacted for personal or medical information that recipient doesn't need, applied as a consistent rule rather than left to an individual adjuster's judgment on each file being shared.

Can claim correspondence like denial letters be generated with the required state disclosures?

Yes, reservation-of-rights letters and denial notices generate with the specific disclosure language the relevant state's unfair claims settlement practices act requires for that denial reason, reducing the risk of a compliance gap from a generic template used across every state.

Does the system integrate with Xactimate or Mitchell for repair estimates?

Yes, estimate data from platforms like Xactimate or Mitchell can pull directly into the claim file, keeping repair cost information alongside the rest of the claim's documents rather than requiring an examiner to check a separate estimating system.

How long do insurance claim documents need to be retained?

Retention periods are set by each state's insurance record-retention rules and often run longer than a company's default document policy, so the system applies the specific period the claim's state requires and overrides it automatically when a litigation hold is placed on that claim.

Can the system assemble a subrogation demand package automatically?

Yes, the supporting documents a subrogation claim needs, the police report, repair estimate, and liability evidence already in the claim file, assemble into one package automatically rather than requiring an examiner to gather them individually before sending a demand.